Concerning detail, exhibitions and photo-essays
Nomothetic cases, project reports and research articles
Observations on the state of affairs in South Asia
Conversations, Presentations and Recordings
Policies and curricular matters in Architecture-related subjects
Concerning professional space, practice, and contests
GREHA (गृह) Document Archive
Nomothetic cases - frequently cited buildings and projects
Master Plan Implementation Support Group, '00-06
Publications by Architexturez and others
Right to Information cases from MPISG and Enaction collections
Essays, reports, research. texts and 'histories'
… But you see, my sense is different I don’t see it in a painterly way. I don’t see it even as a sculptural thing. If I were to place one group here, one group there, one group here, I would be forcing them more into an area than I am in placing them in a very general frame, where their minds can make their groups, not the architecture. I don’t like it nailed down. If you could move it and change it every day without making a nature out of it, fine. But there’s another thing, which constantly pushes me in other directions: I see a building in an anthropomorphic way, as a body. I don’t want to be conscious of how my body functions. I always just expect it to be tremendously resourceful. … Therefore, my tendency is to make a room without any willfulness, except that which the inspiration of the room itself can offer. The sense of commonality, of human agreement, should be in every plan that is made. Nature will give you anything provided you obey its laws. …
— Louis Khan in conversation with Carlos Brillembourg.
Le Corbusier. Chandigarh, the new capital of East Punjab. India, 1965.