There are two aspects to this plan. First is that there is need for funding and the second is a change in mindsets. The government has to be the prime driver of this initiative, but frankly there are no funds available. It is also not likely that they can spend more given the fiscal constraints. ...

The second is the mindset which has to change. We always are very enthusiastic when it comes to starting big programmes which are good because any reform in small measures is less likely to have an impact given the size and complexity of the country and economy. However, we do lack in implementation and give up along the way. Further, the absence of audit and any responsibility for non-completion of the projects ensures that there is no one responsible for completing the project. It becomes difficult when there are three levels of government involved along with another set of private contractors – each with different tenures and parties in power.

For this to happen we should target a smaller number- maybe just one city in a state so as to make it more achievable. Otherwise, it could become like our social programmes where Rs 500 crore is to spend on creating schools and this ends up with structures coming up without roofs or chairs not being installed because the programme has run out of funds. ... If it is to remain in the public domain, then a smaller number must be targeted on a pilot basis and completed so as to serve as templates for other cities. This may be more workable and involve more manageable resources.