Smart cities are becoming all the more common, but not everyone is impressed.
Maarten Hajer, chief curator of the International Architecture Biennale Rotterdam 2016, said that smart technology is “a solution looking for a problem.”
In particular, Hajer refutes the idea that smart technology adoption is inevitable. He also argues that designers and architects aren’t thinking of the solutions that smart technologies like autonomous cars, 3D printing, and big data provide and the consequences of implementation.
“I have an environmental background so I know the data requirements of self-driving vehicles also makes for a very big energy bill,” said Hajer to Dezeen’s Amy Frearson. “Just think about the data requirements of a self-driving vehicle, the sending back and forth of data. You need a stunning number of data centres. You also create reliance on GPS, which is a monopolistic military technology. So there are lots of systemic risks involved that are not getting the attention that they need. If it was an open system I would be much more comfortable, but that’s not the way it usually goes.”
....
When asked for examples of low-tech programs that’ve worked in cities, Hajer points to African projects like re-assembling old European cars and combining solar with geothermal. He also says that things like recycling and making have always been embedded into African culture, and that has helped cities remain vibrant and smart.
Smart cities don’t have one plan to stick to and we’ve seen in cities like London, Paris, Barcelona, Amsterdam, and San Francisco different implementations of smart technologies. Some of them work, some of them don’t, but Hajer is right in saying that it’s up to the city leaders to implement the right systems and ensure it fixes a problem, instead of being an empty solution.