Dear Geeta


Thanks for informing. Due to my business in work I can not offer and react to any comment to NATIONAL DRAFT ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY. However, I will contact you to collect all comments and reactions to enlighten myself.


With best regards


Sincerely


Shakti Prakash


>From: Gita Dewan Verma <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: Master plan issues in media <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [mpisgmedia] Comment on Draft National Environment Policy
>Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mc3-f26.hotmail.com ([64.4.50.162]) by mc3-s12.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:01:21 -0700
>Received: from ns1.ab-a.net ([207.44.194.34]) by mc3-f26.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:00:48 -0700
>Received: from ns1.ab-a.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])by ns1.ab-a.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i9V80Vd15258;Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:30:31 +0530
>Received: from web53803.mail.yahoo.com (web53803.mail.yahoo.com[206.190.36.198])by ns1.ab-a.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i9V80Sd15252for <[email protected]>; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:30:28 +0530
>Received: from [202.89.67.66] by web53803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:59:10 PDT
>X-Message-Info: A2qyToRgF9S6d5fPojT88nFaHPiZzpNlDhvUUWrzSv8=
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>X-BeenThere: [email protected]
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: Master plan issues in media <mpisgmedia.architexturez.net>
>List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://mail.architexturez.net/pipermail/mpisgmedia>
>List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
>List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: <http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia>,<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: [email protected]
>Return-Path: [email protected]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2004 08:00:48.0347 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB7A6AB0:01C4BF1F]
>
>http://plan.architexturez.net/site/dmp2021/ncmp/h/041026
>
>For articulating its starting premise, NEP might have
>used, rather than cause-impact framework for
>degradation, one of conflict-resolution between
>environmental and development objectives, as is
>central to development planning law - which finds no
>mention in NEP... We believe that the key
>environmental challenge is disregard / subversion of
>existing law and that new policy that fails to address
>this is doomed to suffer from identical subversions
>and is, therefore, quite unnecessary... designed to
>let-appear "evolving and flexible policy framework" to
>substitute conflict-resolving law - for pursuit of
>illegal deleterious development in exclusive "spirit
>of partnership" ... No other hypothesis fits the
>reality of recent development distortions in Delhi
>amidst which NEP discourse has been going on...
>
>
>
> > Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Gita Dewan Verma <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Comment on Draft National Environment
> > Policy
> > To: [email protected]
> > CC: [email protected]
> >
> > Dear Madam / Sir,
> >
> > Comment on NEP on behalf of Master Plan
> > Implementation
> > Support Group has been sent vide letter of
> > 26.10.2004.
> >
> >
> > For reasons stated therein the letter has been sent
> > to
> > Secretary MoEF and is posted on the web and the url,
> > for information / record via response eml id, is:
> >
>http://plan.architexturez.net/site/dmp2021/ncmp/h/041026
> >
> > In continuation of eml of 18.09.04 details of
> > planning
> > and development experts involved in drafting NEP are
> > again requested.
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> > Gita Dewan Verma, MPISG Planner
> >
> > ---
> >
> > > Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 03:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
> > > From: Gita Dewan Verma <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Request for DNSP text in html or doc
> > > format, etc
> > > To: [email protected]
> > >
> > > Dear Sir / Madam,
> > >
> > > Draft National Environment Policy (DNEP), posted
> > at
> > > http://envfor.nic.in/nep.htm says it is "intended
> > to
> > > mainstream environmental concerns in all
> > development
> > > activities" (p.3) and "key environmental
> > challenges
> > > ... relate to the nexus of environmental
> > degradation
> > > with poverty ... and economic growth" (p.3).
> > > However,
> > > it makes no reference to planning and development
> > > law
> > > that does address these challenges or to processes
> > > of
> > > its subversion that do pose an emergent key
> > > challenge.
> > >
> > >
> > > I wish to comment on DNEP from this perspective
> > and
> > > would be grateful for the text in html or doc
> > > format.
> > > Actually I would prefer to discuss this with
> > > planning
> > > and development experts involved in DNEP, which
> > does
> > > say it was "prepared through a process of
> > extensive
> > > consultation with experts, as well as diverse
> > > stakeholders, and this process is also documented"
> > > (p.3), though chapter-6 (Process of formulation of
> > > this policy) only says "(To be documented on
> > > completion of the formulation process)" (p.39). I
> > > would be grateful for names, etc, of planning and
> > > development experts involved.
> > >
> > > I also seek clarification of how DNEP connects to
> > > National Common Minimum Programme (not itself
> > being
> > > an
> > > NCMP commitment while incorporating ideas for
> > issues
> > > that are NCMP priorities for which other policy
> > > initiatives are expected).
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > > Gita Dewan Verma, Planner
> > >
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
>http://messenger.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>mpisgmedia mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia


Hey there NRIs! Desi news, films, \x91n more! Stay in the loop!