A MPD2021 draft objections / suggestions blog is
online.
(Gawd not another one... )

Its a little raw at present, but sign up and start
bashing away as a TEAM member. OR just post your
comments to individual posts on the blog.

The blog is at:-

http://mpd2021.blogspot.com/

Sarbajit Roy.


--- Gita Dewan Verma <[email protected]> wrote:

In case anyone else was wondering what happened to
the
anti-Plan munch in Delhi, here:

http://www.hindu.com/2005/06/02/stories/2005060217500300.htm

http://www.hindu.com/2005/06/03/stories/2005060311340300.htm

[nice to see they are using phrases like
citizens-groups and engaging via Public Notice. hope
they also find themselves someone qualified to read
DMP-2001 and DMP-2021 and spot the big differences,
many of which they have been advocating/endorsing]

pioneer series of 8 by 3 is also done. all at:
http://www.ufionline.org/frontpage_debate.htm

then there are expert-groups that came out of DUAC
and
ITPI meetings last month, including people named as
authors in DMP-2021, also alt-Plan making.

and standing committee hearing on 30/05 also had
similar experts with well known anti-Plan/DDA alt
visions about which they might opine via public
notice

---

so much ctrld-alt[Plan]-delete[DMP/DDA] around
humble
Public Notice (that none with clout touched from
S'garhi on ridge to ITPark on river) is flummoxing.

---

further-flummoxing is latest reply-affidavit sworn
by
DDA VC that goes step beyond usual stout insistence
of
authorities-NOT-violating and
petitioners-NOT-in-public-interest to say mpisg
petition, as matter of fact, hinders the interest of
public at large.

we are delighted our court cases against DMP
violations are factually hindering! obviously,
deponent (like his predecessor who once swore we are
not covered by his authority's public-interest
mandate) has not noticed we a-r-e public-at-large,
with private interest in public interest (as
astutely
sighted by senior senor who said IT Park case, not
filed in public-interest about which we have become
frightfully foncused, attempts to agitate that under
garb of pvt interest).

fully flummoxing public-private business now makes
us
wonder:
!maybe DMP2021 public notice is in-bhagidaari!

not being bhagidaars saying aye or not saying nay to
WB-GNCTD-MoEF DUEIPP ideas (become 1999 DMP2021
recos
become 2003 DMP2021 guidelines become 2005
draft-DMP2021 and including also management ideas
like
local-area-plans, etc, that MCD byelaw-reform is
hawking as fresh-thunk-originals) nor wanting to
become intermediaries as per those ideas, whatever
public as-matter-of-fact-hindering-interest-etc says
via public notice is certain to be rejected in
award-winning bhagidaari (witness fate of our
engaging
on 2 doz public-notices from s'garhi to ITpark and
beyond).

btw, Pioneer reported on 04/06 "Bhagidari has won
the
United Nations (UN) Public Service Award 2005 for
improving transparency, accountability and
responsiveness in public service". hallelujah.

so.
like PM lately said, think out-of-the-box.
inviting, then, o-o-t-b thunks.

 

               
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and
more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html
_______________________________________________
mpisgmedia mailing list
[email protected]

http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia

 


               
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/