1. "gawd not another one" was in the context of
pioneer and that ufonline.org website.

2. I have nothing to do with drafting / undrafting of
dmp2021 - I leave that to the experts.

3. I view the MPD2021 blog as a blank canvas where
average joe citizens of Delhi like me can
collaboratively fine-tune their objections and
suggestions, and get criticised and corrected by
plannerly experts.

4. Right to information as Gita well knows is one of
my hobby horses. Better information means better
objections / suggestions.

5. Point about MPD2001 wrt MPD2021 is well taken, is
there any online / electronic version of MPD2001
available. As it is converting MPD2021 draft from PDF
files to a reasonably formatted text version is
working my fingers to the bone.

6. New Rule in the Blog : DDA bashing not permitted.

Start Blogging : PLEASE :-(
Sarbajit

--- Gita Dewan Verma <[email protected]> wrote:

--- sarbajit roy <[email protected]> wrote:

A MPD2021 draft objections / suggestions blog is
online.
(Gawd not another one... )

....

http://mpd2021.blogspot.com

 

in reply to:
DMP2021 pubblic notice and bhagidaari

http://mail.architexturez.net/pipermail/mpisgmedia/2005-June/000371.html

 


i want to clarify i have no gawd-not-another-one
issue
with sarabjit's blog because sarabjit has not been
party to the making of dmp2021 / unmaking of
dmp2001.

maybe blog rules should have something against
DDA-bashing and for reference to DMP2001.

a distinction must be made between DDA the
organisation and DDA the Authority. the latter has
all
tiers of government and others and appoints
committees
etc, all under DD Act, and if these act de-hors of
the
Act, there is no point blaming the former.

Public Notice process is better viewed as safeguard
to
mind against downsizing of Plan entitlements /
solutions rather than as alternative-Plan pushing
opportunity. DMP-2021 is not new Plan but Plan
revision, ie, rather than commenting on it in a
vacuum, it is more meaningful to comment on
comparison
between DMP-2001 and DMP-2021. (Never mind larger
promises of world-classiness and this or that; each
little provision of DMP2001 is entitlement and it is
the job of planners to cook up larger wholes without
downsizing the parts).

And please note: logical culmination of DDA-bashing
/
DMP-2001 ignoring trends is
blind-men-around-elephant
local-area-plan style urbanism in care of MCD /
GNCTD
multiplicity and its growing bhagidaars. hallelujah.

 

 


               
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for
the weekend. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html

_______________________________________________
mpisgmedia mailing list
[email protected]

http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia