Well put poonam,

1)Are we allowed to take recording devices with us
into the proceedings?

2) From what sanjha manch is upto - also story in
today's Economic Times (Left calls for law to stop
slum demolition) - this matter is going to be fought
on constitutional grounds.

3) With Delhi HC itself calling for wholesale
implementation of Mixed Land Use (today's newspapers),
the game is well and truly afoot.

4) With the 74th Amendment dealing with
Municipalities, it seems Sanjha Manch wants DDA to be
abolished / merged with MCD.

http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend74.htm

5) How sure are we of Rule 9, and is it still in
force, was it ever in force, has it been modified, can
it be superceded / over-ridden? In this context, if we
recall my prawn malai posts, nobody could then show me
a law which a public servant was breaking  - Here in
Rule 9 we have a perfect example of a law being broken
- of public servants not dealing with the property
(documents) we have entrusted to them to be dealt with
as per said law - so as to dishonestly cause wrongful
gain and loss (of property - LOTS of property) to
various persons. Time for a little notice,

6) Gita, in a previous post, had asked "is DDA above
RTI"? Time will tell - we dont have time - given 3
months we would have the answer - Rule 9 encapsulates
every ingredient of Article 19.

7) I would like to coordinate with Gita about notices
which Rajinder, Nizamuddin, Ashok etc ought to quickly
put in concerning Rule 9 and their denial of Rights
thereunder.

8) The Hindu story reveals why Sanjha munch is wary of
DMP2021 - their slum vote banks are being directly
targeted by the new proposals - which is why they want
to stall DMP2021 - or expand their role. Also they are
hand in glove with DDA which has already planned to
hold these public hearings zone wise all over Delhi.

9) Will anyone clarify for me: A.K.Jain is on the
Enquiry Board, he is also the Secretary of this Board?
Since he has signed the Land Use plan, and since he
has also signed the draft Zonal Plan (part) for Zone K
(not yet passed) - how can he sit on any board which
will hear my objns for dwarka.? How can VC sit on said
board when as member of Supreme Court monitoring
Committee in Industries judgement - I am complaining
about his failure / contempt to get directions of SC
fulfilled?

10) Violation of Fundamental Rights, Denial of Natural
Justice during proceedings, Vires of Laws - what are
we waiting for???

Sarbajit

--- poonam prakash
<[email protected]> wrote:

Just to add to Gita's report on yesterday's meeting;

This was the the fifth board meeting and first
'public hearing'. Order of
the invitees was neither as per the registration nor
the objection reference
number so ITPI and PHDCCI and heritage committee
took almost all the time
before tea.

Issue of illegality was raised by no one else before
Gita's turn so let me
narrate it as I remember it happened:

Gita: I would like to be introduced to the members
of the Board
VC: We introduced ourselves in the morning
Gita: I am being heard now so I would like to know
(There were seven people sitting on the dais as
mentioned earlier)
VC (looking around): well, I am the chairman, Mr.
Gurmukhi from the TCPO and
Mr. Jain (commissioner planning).
Gita: You need three members for the enquiry
VC/ Comm.: We are three members
Gita: Mr. Jain, you can not be on the board because
the rule clearly
provides member of either authority or the advisory
council. if you assure
me that this constitution is as per the rules I will
go ahead
(Silence)
Comm(plng) We assure you. Please Go ahead.
! and so the hearing continued after GIta left.
There were couple of others
and by 12:30 it was open house, if any one wanted to
say anything. Couple of
people, including S.C.Gupta commented. S.C.Gupta
mentioned that Urban Land
Policy shoudl be in a separate document for which
cabinet approval should be
sought so as to implement the Plan.

Besides K.T. Ravindran and Dinesh Mohan, various
NGOs too were listed in
after lunch session; Ashray Adhikar Abhiyan, Human
Rights Law Network,
Lokayan. Deapite this, Sajjha Munch continues to
whine that there is no
response, as per the report of The Hindu today:

DDA's indifference to Master Plan criticised

Staff Reporter


With Delhi Development Authority not giving any
acknowledgment or public
response on whether and how it would treat over
20,000 objections filed on
the draft Master Plan of Delhi 2021 by concerned
citizens and groups, an
alliance of voluntary organisations, Sanjha Manch,
has charged the Authority
with seriously undermining the issue of public
participation, mandated even
by the 74th Constitutional Amendment, and having
only its own officials in a
committee constituted for reviewing the objections.

 

http://www.hindu.com/2005/10/04/stories/2005100413540400.htm


An illegal Board has started today illegal

NGO-style

hearings at PHD House and

VPSingh/Sajha-Munch,

who

have made illegal demand for their nominee

to be

on

Board, plan to protest bureaucratic-style
functioning
outside DDA Vikas Sadan. we are trapped

between

two

illegal choices. we know we have been

trapped.

what

will we do now? *now*. the endgame has

begun.


...

Do please browse the urls in this post.

 

http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00575.shtml

 


__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________

mpisgmedia mailing list
[email protected]

http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia

 

 

__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
mpisgmedia mailing list
[email protected]

http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia


_______________________________________________
mpisgmedia mailing list
[email protected]

http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia

 

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 -

Release Date: 10/3/05

 


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 -
Release Date: 10/3/05

_______________________________________________
mpisgmedia mailing list
[email protected]

http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia

 


               
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com