leon morenas wrote: 

Is this panel discussion set up in the same vein as the earlier one was? [  http://www.niua.org/mpd/delhi_master_plan_2021.htm ]? Frankly, the  powerpoint presentations for public dissemination that are available at the  above url are insipid re-utterances that I have been hearing since my own  engagement with Delhi and these presentations lack the sort of critical  analysis especially about the politics of development in Delhi... For one, I  am especially interested in how the hegemony of the Master Plan is being  threatened by the USAID driven JNUURM? 

Reiterating that the Master Plan notified on February 7 is going to  create a mess in the city, Jagmohan said by legalising commercial  establishments on 2,183 roads under the cover of mixed land use norms,  the government was just adding to the chaos. 

"Mixed land use should be allowed in an area as long as it is coincides  with the original layout plan and the service plans of a colony. But the  Master Plan legalises commercial establishments that came up due to  abetment by the politicians. No one has bothered to check if  infrastrucutre can actually be developed in these areas to serve the  commercial requirements. This Plan will only lead to dishonest  implementation,"Jagmohan said. 

Dwelling on the problems that come in the way of planning, School of  Planning and Architecture, Dean, KT Ravindran said, "The problem is not  of multiplicity of authorities but that of each agency having different  functions which do not coincide. Thus it is important to put in place a  cohesive mechanism for planning and implementation of the same." 

Architect and The Times of India columnist Sudhir Vohra1 too asserted  that planning and governance has to converge somewhere to give Delhi a  better future. 

On the highlights of the Perspective Plan, Jagan Shah from NIUA said,  "The Plan is an alternative Master Plan for the city which calls for a  paradigm shift from looking at land use in isolation. Our Plan talks of  integrated development of an area where land should be treated as a  wholesome entity with infrastructure, facilities like transport and  liveability accounted for." 

cont'd....leon morenas wrote: 

Is this panel discussion set up in the same vein as the earlier one was? [  http://www.niua.org/mpd/delhi_master_plan_2021.htm ]? Frankly, the  powerpoint presentations for public dissemination that are available at the  above url are insipid re-utterances that I have been hearing since my own  engagement with Delhi and these presentations lack the sort of critical  analysis especially about the politics of development in Delhi... For one, I  am especially interested in how the hegemony of the Master Plan is being  threatened by the USAID driven JNUURM? 

 Reiterating that the Master Plan notified on February 7 is going to  create a mess in the city, Jagmohan said by legalising commercial  establishments on 2,183 roads under the cover of mixed land use norms,  the government was just adding to the chaos. 

"Mixed land use should be allowed in an area as long as it is coincides  with the original layout plan and the service plans of a colony. But the  Master Plan legalises commercial establishments that came up due to  abetment by the politicians. No one has bothered to check if  infrastrucutre can actually be developed in these areas to serve the  commercial requirements. This Plan will only lead to dishonest  implementation,"Jagmohan said. 

Dwelling on the problems that come in the way of planning, School of  Planning and Architecture, Dean, KT Ravindran said, "The problem is not  of multiplicity of authorities but that of each agency having different  functions which do not coincide. Thus it is important to put in place a  cohesive mechanism for planning and implementation of the same." 

Architect and The Times of India columnist Sudhir Vohra too asserted  that planning and governance has to converge somewhere to give Delhi a  better future. 

On the highlights of the Perspective Plan, Jagan Shah from NIUA said,  "The Plan is an alternative Master Plan for the city which calls for a  paradigm shift from looking at land use in isolation. Our Plan talks of  integrated development of an area where land should be treated as a  wholesome entity with infrastructure, facilities like transport and  liveability accounted for." 

  • 1. Source:  http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Delhi/Its_a_master_plan_for_chaos_Jagmohan/articleshow/1704247.cms