I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
121. Cane and bamboo products 122. Clay and modelling with Plaster of Paris 123. Dari/Carpet / Sari weaving (except dying & bleaching)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: Inclusion of specific text such as this concerning permitting industries to continue functioning within or near residential / non-conforming areas without heed to fundamental rights of lawful residents, is against mandate of DDA to prepare Master Plans. I object that the impugned text makes a mockery of the planned development of Delhi, and is against the letter and spirit of the DDA Act. Delhi Development Act requires a holistic survey basis for Plan preparation and the statutory Plan requires a holistic monitoring basis for Plan modification. The Draft MPD-2021 admits that there is no holistic monitoring institution /mechanism in place. Furthermore there is nothing in the Draft MPD-2021 to show that inclusion of this particular and specific impugned text has been done after complete and due procedures have been followed. Powers to modify the Plan cannot be misused in this casual fashion.I again say that there is no place for such arbitrary and discretionary clauses in MPD-2021, and hence this text needs to be reconsidered or deleted. Furthermore, there are already substantive provisions in other laws of India concerning such matters, and hence there is no need for MPD-2021 to deprive and restrict the residents of Delhi from the better protections of those laws.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
124. Stone engraving
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: It is very clear that a primary purpose of this impugned text is to allow Industries to illegally continue to operate within Delhi, despite Supreme Court orders and Constitutional provisions banning this. I say that this objectionable and impugned text violates numerous Fundamental Rights of the populace of Delhi, and as such is highly unConstitutional. I further say that this text is a transparent device to disobey the judicial process and to frustrate the numerous litigations pending against DDA in the Courts. The guidelines illegally published / leaked by DDA concerning this aspect have allowed all sorts of illegal and irregular building, construction and encroachments to take place in anticipation of these particular clauses in Master Plan. Furthermore, there are already substantive provisions in other laws of India concerning like issues and numerous Courts have ruled on these issues, so where is the need for MPD-2021 to deprive and restrict the residents of Delhi from the better protections of other laws? Hence also I say that inclusion of this text or any similar discriminatory text in Master Plan is a fraud on the public (and lawful residents of Delhi) by DDA / MoUD, and is objectionable. As the sole development authority entrusted with acquisition, development and disposal of land within Delhi, DDA cannot misuse its monopoly in such blatantly unConstitutional fashion, by inclusion of text such as this. I submit that this text need to deleted in-toto or altered greatly. Stone engraving is already covered elsewhere in this chapter.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
125. Village pottery Industry (without bhatti) 126. Village oil ghani
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: Certainly, there is no objection to industries running lawfully, but poorly drafted and random text such as I have impugned, must not find its way into MPD-2021. Little attention has been paid to the issue of diversion of scarce physical / natural resources and utilities which are being diverted to industries at cost of residents of Delhi.I submit that this impugned text is not only against the planned development of Delhi, but also against the letter and spirit of the National Capital Regional Plan (which I consider to be overiding over any Master Plan for Delhi alone. The implications of this impugned and arbitrary text (for special interests)include causing population growth by migration into Delhi (by creating a magnet)even as limitation of growth is by far the most urgent imperative for Delhi. Hence also I find this text to be objectionable. I also find the data and assumptions behind this text to be flawed and suspect. Also when the Draft Regional Plan itself has not been passed / notified (I believe that 16-June-2005 was the date set for meeting of Chief Ministers and Secretaries to do so), I strongly object to inclusion of this impugned text in absence of up-to-date Regional Plan. It is relevant that Draft MPD-2021 itself admits that Master Plan of Delhi is contingent upon Regional Plan. I question how DDA / MoUD have notified Draft MPD-2021 at this time for public notice and 90 days period for objections when the umbrella Regional Plan itself has not been finalised. I question and suspect the motives and bonafides of the persons who are rushing this impugned text through and I say it is essential that the lobby behnd this objectionable text be identified. NO VILLAGE POTTERY - IT IS POLLUTING AS RESIDENTS OF DWARKA KNOW WELL.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
127. Wood carving and decorative and wood wares.
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: I object that the text I have impugned above is an affront to all planners and professional persons, and thoroughly exposes the DDA (or whoever has drafted this shoddy and discriminatory text) to be incompetent and/or corrupt persons. I further say that this malafide text is at the cost of the public, is against the public interest and is objectionable on Constitutional grounds also. I question the composition / competence of the persons who have drafted this text. Is this impugned text in the public interest ? I say it is NOT! Does this impugned text preserve and protect the numerous Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution ? Again I must say NO! How then can such questionable text be considered as neccessary for inclusion in the MPD-2021? There is no basis for such half-baked and subversive text pandering to vested interests to be included in MPD-2021. I require and demand to know how this text has found its way into any proposed Plan document, and I hereby put DDA on notice to inform me of the same. I submit that this inequituous impugned text needs to be completely redrafted or deleted altogether, so as to address my concerns.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
None of the industries mentioned in Group A and A-1 shall carry out the following processes: i) Anodising ii) Bleaching iii) Burning of coal iv) Canning Facility v) Dyeing vi) Electroplating vii) Moulding works viii) Use of CFC gases ix) Varnishing x) Washing
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The text I have impugned above is clearly designed for political reasons alone, and as such is absolutely against the Constitution and also letter and spirit of the laws of India (passed by Parliament) concerning the planned development of Delhi. Not only is this text contrary to DDA's statutory mandate, but this text seeks to subvert and obfuscate or dilute the better Master Plan provisions already in place. This is regressive and highly objectionable. There is no place for such arbitrary and discriminatory text in MPD-2021 which perpetuates inequities and imbalances in industrial faciities for vast sections of society.Furthermore, this kind of specific text encourages and perpetuates irregular activities beyond infrastructure carrying capacity of Delhi. I say that all the attempts to cover up the past failures of DDA / MoUD for planned development of Delhi by inclusion of such malafide and disastrous text as the text I have impugned, will not work. What is required instead is a new and comprehensive and balanced approach to planned development for Delhi, which corrupt, incompetent and fossilised bodies like DDA cannot concieve of, leave alone deliver upon. I must again submit that this impugned text needs to be completely deleted, or redrafted substantially so as to completely address my concerns.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
Notes: i) Storing of chemicals listed under schedule I and/ or II of the Manufacture, Storage and import of hazardous Chemical Rules, 1989 and Public Liability Insurance Act, 1990 shall be prohibited.
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
ii) No effluent / emissions shall be allowed to be generated by the units and these shall adhere to the noise standards as stipulated by Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India.
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: I fail to understand how has this text can be included in any legislation of India. It is poorly drafted, ambiguous, and is open to misuse. This impugned text while adversely affecting other Plan provisions, is also violative of numerous Judgements of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, and will jeopardise the proper planned development of Delhi, whilst legitimising all kinds of illegal and irregular industrial activities. Once again I must question how text such as this keeps finding its way into Plan documents. Are there any special interests being served by inclusion of such anti-public text? I must say YES! Is the inclusion of this specific impugned text as per mandate of DDA as per section 7 of DDA ACT? I must say NO - for I find no supporting basis for inclusion of this obnoxious text in the DDA ACT which permits this.Surely this text is against the proper development of Delhi, and I oppose the inclusion of this text, and all such similarly objectionable text into MPD-2021, which this chapter of Draft MPD-2021 is littered with. There is no place in MPD-2021 for such text by which DDA continues to misuse its monopoly over land in Delhi.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
PROHIBITED (NEGATIVE LIST) Industries manufacturing the following shall be prohibited within National Capital Territory of Delhi
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: I say that the impugned text makes scant logical sense, and needs to be redrafted with considerable care and attention. There does not seem to have been application of mind in its drafting. I submit furthermore that although this text may appear to be routine, it has deep ramifications and the potential to vitiate the planned and orderly development of Delhi. Also, there is no lawful basis for inclusion of this text in Master Plan, since it represents a departure from DDA's mandate and is objectionble. The proposed text distorts and skews development activity and is in conflict with specific provisions of NCR Plans (including draft Plans). I again say that there is no place for such arbitrary and discretionary clauses in MPD-2021, and hence this text needs to be reconsidered. Furthermore, there are already substantive provisions in other laws of India concerning such matters, and hence there is no need for MPD-2021 to deprive and restrict the residents of Delhi from the better protections of those laws. As the sole development authority entrusted with acquisition, development and disposal of land within Delhi, DDA cannot misuse its monopoly in such blatantly unConstitutional fashion, by inclusion of text such as this.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
1. Arc/induction furnace of more than 3 tons per charge
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
2. Acids
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
3. Alkalis
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: As a resident of Dwarka Project, directly affected by this text, I object strongly to this clause. It is well known to DDA that there is tremendous pollution and discharge of toxic emissions and hazardous effluents being caused by industries located within Dwarka Project, such as at Bindapur, Indra Park Extn., Dabri, Matiyala, Kakrola, etc. which are affecting lawful residents of planned and developed sectors of DDA within Dwarka. The stringent existing MPD-2001 provisions and the Supreme Court order of 07-May-2005 having failed to stop these numerous toxic industries (especially clay, plastic and scrap processing units) within Dwarka from operating, it would be most apalling if lawful residents of Dwarka are deprived from enjoying their basic fundamental rights. As is well known this state of affairs is because it is admitted fact that DDA has miserably failed to notify the zonal development plans for the Urban Extension Areas, and that successive corrupt planners of DDA have wilfully disobeyed and perjured themselves to the Supreme Court. Any indirect attempts in MPD-2021 to allow polluting industries to operate by affecting residential areas - such as in-situ regularisation - must be deleted from the MPD-2021.The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
4. Animal & fish oils
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
5. Aldehydes
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
6. Acid slurry
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
7. Acetylides, phridines, iodoform, chloroform, E-nepthol, etc.
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: Since I, my family, my neighbours and numerous other residents of Dwarka Project are being similarly harmed and nuisanced by illegal / irregular development activities which are encouraged and abetted by MPD clauses like the above I take strong objection to inclusion of this kind of text in MPD-2021. It is relevant to specify that I had duly filed my objections to in-situ regularisation to the public notice of nodal Ministry of Urban Development - who have not seen fit to consider any objections and have merely acted as a Post Office. I hence say that I have thus far been deprived of my Fundamental Rights and effacious statutory remedies. I say that likewise this Chapter on industrial activity is littered with horrible clauses to slyly allow industry to function within Delhi such as by spot-zoning and irregular Change of Land Use, which are now sought to be legitmised post facto. The Information Technology Park at Shastri Park Metro being an excellent example of this tactic of DDA which will be used against Dwarka residents where the MRTS is widepread.This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
8. Ammonium sulphoajanide, arsenic and its compounds, barium carbonate, barium cyanide, barium ethyle sulphate, barium acetate cinnabar, copper sulphocyanide, ferrocyanide, hydro cyanide, hydro cyanic acid, potassium biocalate, potassium, cyanide, prussiate of potash, phynigallc acid, silver cyanide
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
9. Aircraft building.
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA. If France, USA, Britian and Germany can have highly profitable aircraft building industry, then why cannot Delhi ? How many junior stenos are there in DDA?
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
10. Abattoirs, animal blood processing.(except existing and relocation)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA. Another inclusion by the Supreme Court?
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
11. Bitumen blowing (hot)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
12. Brick kiln (using fresh earth as raw material, coal as fuel)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
13. B-nepthol
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: As a resident of Dwarka Project, directly affected by this text, I object strongly to this clause. It is well known to DDA that there is tremendous pollution and discharge of toxic emissions and hazardous effluents being caused by industries located within Dwarka Project, such as at Bindapur, Indra Park Extn., Dabri, Matiyala, Kakrola, etc. which are affecting lawful residents of planned and developed sectors of DDA within Dwarka. The stringent existing MPD-2001 provisions and the Supreme Court order of 07-May-2005 having failed to stop these numerous toxic industries (especially clay, plastic and scrap processing units) within Dwarka from operating, it would be most apalling if lawful residents of Dwarka are deprived from enjoying their basic fundamental rights. As is well known this state of affairs is because it is admitted fact that DDA has miserably failed to notify the zonal development plans for the Urban Extension Areas, and that successive corrupt planners of DDA have wilfully disobeyed and perjured themselves to the Supreme Court. Any indirect attempts in MPD-2021 to allow polluting industries to operate by affecting residential areas - such as in-situ regularisation - must be deleted from the MPD-2021.The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA. What is B-nepthol?
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
14. Bakelite powder (starting from formaldehyde)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
15. Barely malt and extract
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
16. Bone-grist, bone-meal, salting of bones, storages of bones in open, bone drying
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
17. Bone charcoal manufacturing
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: Since I, my family, my neighbours and numerous other residents of Dwarka Project are being similarly harmed and nuisanced by illegal / irregular development activities which are encouraged and abetted by MPD clauses like the above I take strong objection to inclusion of this kind of text in MPD-2021. It is relevant to specify that I had duly filed my objections to in-situ regularisation to the public notice of nodal Ministry of Urban Development - who have not seen fit to consider any objections and have merely acted as a Post Office. I hence say that I have thus far been deprived of my Fundamental Rights and effacious statutory remedies. I say that likewise this Chapter on industrial activity is littered with horrible clauses to slyly allow industry to function within Delhi such as by spot-zoning and irregular Change of Land Use, which are now sought to be legitmised post facto. The Information Technology Park at Shastri Park Metro being an excellent example of this tactic of DDA which will be used against Dwarka residents where the MRTS is widepread.This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA. Is bone charcoal still manufactured ?
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
18. Blast furnaces - coal fired
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
19. Bicycles (integrated plant)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA. Quite right, Delhi is not Ludhiana.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
20. Brewery and potable spirits
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA. You cant make spiritin Delhi, but you can drink it here ?
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
21. Chlorinated paraffin wax purification
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
22. Carbon black
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
23. Cement industry
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: As a resident of Dwarka Project, directly affected by this text, I object strongly to this clause. It is well known to DDA that there is tremendous pollution and discharge of toxic emissions and hazardous effluents being caused by industries located within Dwarka Project, such as at Bindapur, Indra Park Extn., Dabri, Matiyala, Kakrola, etc. which are affecting lawful residents of planned and developed sectors of DDA within Dwarka. The stringent existing MPD-2001 provisions and the Supreme Court order of 07-May-2005 having failed to stop these numerous toxic industries (especially clay, plastic and scrap processing units) within Dwarka from operating, it would be most apalling if lawful residents of Dwarka are deprived from enjoying their basic fundamental rights. As is well known this state of affairs is because it is admitted fact that DDA has miserably failed to notify the zonal development plans for the Urban Extension Areas, and that successive corrupt planners of DDA have wilfully disobeyed and perjured themselves to the Supreme Court. Any indirect attempts in MPD-2021 to allow polluting industries to operate by affecting residential areas - such as in-situ regularisation - must be deleted from the MPD-2021.The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
24. Calcium carbide, phosphorous, aluminum dust paste and powder, copper, zinc, etc. (electrothermal industries)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
25. Cranes, hoists and lifts (excluding assembly)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process. Crane manufacture MUST be allowed in delhi.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
26. General industrial machinery (such as hydraulic equipments, drilling equipments, boilers, etc.)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA. General industrial machinery (such as hydraulic equipments, drilling equipments, boilers, etc.) MUST BE PERMITTED WITHIN DELHI.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
27. DOP (Dioctyl Phthalate), DBP & Plasticizer
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: Since I, my family, my neighbours and numerous other residents of Dwarka Project are being similarly harmed and nuisanced by illegal / irregular development activities which are encouraged and abetted by MPD clauses like the above I take strong objection to inclusion of this kind of text in MPD-2021. It is relevant to specify that I had duly filed my objections to in-situ regularisation to the public notice of nodal Ministry of Urban Development - who have not seen fit to consider any objections and have merely acted as a Post Office. I hence say that I have thus far been deprived of my Fundamental Rights and effacious statutory remedies. I say that likewise this Chapter on industrial activity is littered with horrible clauses to slyly allow industry to function within Delhi such as by spot-zoning and irregular Change of Land Use, which are now sought to be legitmised post facto. The Information Technology Park at Shastri Park Metro being an excellent example of this tactic of DDA which will be used against Dwarka residents where the MRTS is widepread.This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
28. Dry cell battery
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
29. Dye & dye intermediates
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
30. Distillation of wood, chemical seasoning of wood (excluding steam seasoning)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
31. Explosives, i.e., Fireworks, Gunpowder, Guncotton, etc.
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
32. Earth moving machinery/equipment (manufacturing of assembly)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
33. Electric wires and cables (more than 100 workers, 2000 sq.m land)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: As a resident of Dwarka Project, directly affected by this text concerning electrical cables and wires, I object strongly to this clause. It is well known to DDA that there is tremendous pollution and discharge of toxic emissions and hazardous effluents being caused by industries located within Dwarka Project, such as at Bindapur, Indra Park Extn., Dabri, Matiyala, Kakrola, etc. which are affecting lawful residents of planned and developed sectors of DDA within Dwarka. The stringent existing MPD-2001 provisions and the Supreme Court order of 07-May-2005 having failed to stop these numerous toxic industries (especially clay, plastic and scrap processing units) within Dwarka from operating, it would be most apalling if lawful residents of Dwarka are deprived from enjoying their basic fundamental rights. As is well known this state of affairs is because it is admitted fact that DDA has miserably failed to notify the zonal development plans for the Urban Extension Areas, and that successive corrupt planners of DDA have wilfully disobeyed and perjured themselves to the Supreme Court. Any indirect attempts in MPD-2021 to allow polluting industries to operate by affecting residential areas - such as in-situ regularisation - must be deleted from the MPD-2021.The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
34. Fatty acids
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
35. Fungicides & pesticides
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
36. Flexographic ink
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
37. Fuel oils, illuminating oils and other oils such as stchetic oil, shoal oil, lubricants
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: Since I, my family, my neighbours and numerous other residents of Dwarka Project are being similarly harmed and nuisanced by illegal / irregular development activities which are encouraged and abetted by MPD clauses like the above I take strong objection to inclusion of this kind of text in MPD-2021. It is relevant to specify that I had duly filed my objections to in-situ regularisation to the public notice of nodal Ministry of Urban Development - who have not seen fit to consider any objections and have merely acted as a Post Office. I hence say that I have thus far been deprived of my Fundamental Rights and effacious statutory remedies. I say that likewise this Chapter on industrial activity is littered with horrible clauses to slyly allow industry to function within Delhi such as by spot-zoning and irregular Change of Land Use, which are now sought to be legitmised post facto. The Information Technology Park at Shastri Park Metro being an excellent example of this tactic of DDA which will be used against Dwarka residents where the MRTS is widepread.This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
38. Foundries (heavy)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
39. Gas compressors
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA. Without gas compressors how will CNG plants and dispensors operate?
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
40. Graphite production
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
41. Glass furnace (more than 1 ton/day capacity)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
42. Gases-carbon-disulphide, ultramarine blue, chlorine, hydrogen, sulphur dioxide, acetylene, etc. (other than LPG/CNG/Oxygen/medical gases)
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: The scientific data and foundations upon which this inclusion is made, is obsolete and false, and there is no scientific or legal basis for such specific text to be included in MPD-2021. Master Plan is only concerned with laying the guidelines and framework for development of Delhi, and inclusion of specific text of this nature at Master Plan hierarchial level is highly objectionable, as it subverts the hierarchial planning process.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
43. Glandular/glandes extraction
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: As a resident of Dwarka Project, directly affected by this text, I object strongly to this clause. It is well known to DDA that there is tremendous pollution and discharge of toxic emissions and hazardous effluents being caused by industries located within Dwarka Project, such as at Bindapur, Indra Park Extn., Dabri, Matiyala, Kakrola, etc. which are affecting lawful residents of planned and developed sectors of DDA within Dwarka. The stringent existing MPD-2001 provisions and the Supreme Court order of 07-May-2005 having failed to stop these numerous toxic industries (especially clay, plastic and scrap processing units) within Dwarka from operating, it would be most apalling if lawful residents of Dwarka are deprived from enjoying their basic fundamental rights. As is well known this state of affairs is because it is admitted fact that DDA has miserably failed to notify the zonal development plans for the Urban Extension Areas, and that successive corrupt planners of DDA have wilfully disobeyed and perjured themselves to the Supreme Court. Any indirect attempts in MPD-2021 to allow polluting industries to operate by affecting residential areas - such as in-situ regularisation - must be deleted from the MPD-2021.The inclusion of this kind of specific text is well outside the mandate of Master Plan, which is a broad policy framework. The inclusion of specific text of this nature into the MPD-2021 leads cause suspicion that vested interests still hold sway over DDA.
I object to the inclusion of the following text in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021:-
44. Glue and gelatine from bones and flesh
SUMMARY OF GROUNDS: This kind of specific text is included without application of mind, has no scientific basis, and infringes upon the Fundamental Right under Article 19 of citizens (especially technocrats, and industrialists to carry out their business and profession in proximity to their homes. There are several relevant Judgements of Supreme Court concerning this which seem to have been deliberately ignored by DDA.