A IHR-SAHGB Architectural History Seminar series led by Dr Patrick Zamarian (Liverpool School of Architecture). Patrick will discuss his research on the postwar Architectural Association via Teams, followed by questions and discussion.

In 1936, W.H. Ansell, a former chairman of the RIBA’s Board of Architectural Education, was unambiguous about the nature of architectural training: ‘Education, to this Institute, is a technical and vocational affair.’ Today, the RIBA takes a different view and speaks of the ‘academic discipline of architecture’. This shift was largely a consequence of the 1958 Oxford Conference, itself the result of a campaign by a group of official architects intent on raising the profile of the profession through higher academic standards. Underpinning their technocratic agenda was a growing interest in the scientific aspects of architecture, which had its roots in the 1930s and was (and remained) closely linked to the work of the government’s Building Research Station.

The BRS sought – initially with little success – to promote a more science-based approach to the teaching of architects to ensure the proper application of its findings in future practice. My paper explores how these concerns were channelled into a comprehensive pedagogical reform agenda which eventually culminated in the Oxford Conference. The key figure in this was William Allen (1914–1998), who, as chief architect to the BRS, took up a pivotal position at the intersection of building science and professional practice. The paper will show how, over the course of two decades, Allen used the institutional machinery of both the BRS and RIBA to inject a scientific outlook into the training of architects. His success in doing so positions Allen as one of the major – albeit until now largely ignored – figures in British postwar architecture.