The First Symposium of the Photography Network, based in the US and an affiliated society of the College Art Association (CAA), will be held next October online and is jointly hosted by the Photography Network and Folkwang University of the Arts. The symposium is dedicated to »The Material and the Virtual in Photographic Histories«.

Over the last twenty years, the study of photography’s history has been characterized by, among other things, two major strands: a concentration on the photograph’s status as an object and a concern with the decidedly virtual quality of its images and practices. The 2019 conference »Material Immaterial: Photographs in the 21st Century« considered these two directions in photographic conservation by asking if the physical photograph still matters today as a source of teaching, learning, and scholarship when the intangibles of code now direct the production and archiving of images. Now from a methodological direction, this symposium seeks to inquire further into the longer historical implications of the distance increasingly perceived between photography’s status as an object and its life as what could be called the intangible »photographic.«

On one side of the ledger in historical studies, Elizabeth Edwards has long proposed that we consider photography’s object history, Geoffrey Batchen emphasized the haptic qualities of long-neglected vernacular photographies, the Museum of Modern Art engaged a years-long conservation and curatorial project named »Photo: Object,« while the »Silver Atlantic« initiative in Paris explores the mineral histories that the medium arose from and transformed. But at the same time, Tina Campt has asked us to listen to photography, Fred Ritchin has admonished that we study photography’s virtual lives in social media, and Ariella Azoulay proposes that we consider the larger sphere of habits, customs, and civic contracts that surround photographic activity and its images. The same division has emerged with ever-greater strength in the production and curating of images. Many photographers, for example, have returned to alternative processes or emphasized the material contexts of their work's production, while others use online virtual worlds as a source for appropriation, manipulation, and posting, or they emphasize the social practices and performances of identity that give rise to new work. Curators, too, (especially during the pandemic) grapple with presenting the physicality of photographic objects in online contexts, even as they puzzle over how to collect purely virtual works and otherwise signal the larger social contexts in which the photographic intervenes.

Given this consistent breakdown, the symposium asks where the object-based and the virtual of photography’s histories meet? How can the two strands in photo studies be brought together and harnessed to reconsider existing problems or be put to use for new investigations?