Problematized by art (Allora & Calzadilla 2013; Fritsch 2013; Dion 2011), philosophy (Despret, 2021; Nancy, 2014; Lestel, 2010), and contemporary art criticism (Ramos 2016; Teixeira Pinto 2015; Niermann 2013; Baker 2000), the controversial relationship between artistic affection and animality is more than ever a rich and futurable theme of interdisciplinary perspectives and intermedial approaches.

From Gerhard Richter’s photo-paintings of antelopes, to Kiki Smith’s sculptures of extinct species, from Maurizio Cattelan’s installations of stuffed birds, to Berlinde De Bruyckere’s drawings of chunks of flesh, from Pierre Huyghe’s écosystèmes, to Tomás Saraceno’s spider webs, the intricate relationship between visual art and animal imaginary continues to foster the international critical debate by establishing itself at the core of contemporary theoretical and aesthetic reflection.

The book Theater, Garden, Bestiary. A Materialist History of Exhibitions (Garcia, Normand 2019), the exhibition Animals. Respect / Harmony / Subjugation Subjugation (Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe, Hamburg, 2018), the dOCUMENTA (13) in Kassel, and the exhibition Zoométries. Hedendaagse Kunst in de ban van het dier (Université de Gand, 2003) are just some of the significant testimonies of the complex dialogue between artistic research and the animal kingdom in the twenty-first century.

An age-old question of an ethical, philosophical, political, and social nature, the relationship between the art and concept of animality sinks some of its deepest and memorable roots in the historic avant-gardes. Accomplices of this compelling reading are Hans Arp’s Cobra-Centaur (1952), Meret Oppenheim’s mug of beer with a squirrel’s tail for a handle (L’Écureuil, 1960), Unica Zürn’s phantasmagorical bestiaries (La Serpenta, 1957), and the autobiography Écritures (1970) by Max Ernst who, as concerns the recurring image of a bird in his paintings, wrote as follows: "En 1930, […] j’ai eu la visite presque journalière du Supérieur des oiseaux, nommé Loplop, fantôme particulier d’une fidélité modèle, attaché à ma personne. Il me présenta un cœur en cage, la mer en cage, deux pétales, trois feuilles, une fleur et une jeune fille."

A symptom of the twentieth century’s overturning of history, of its technological advances, and of the climate crisis, the animal issue was examined several decades later by the neo-avant-gardes of the 1960s and 1970s in light of a new critical, aesthetic, and conceptual perspective, which once again pondered the natural and cultural time of the Anthropocene. In the years when Joseph Beuys explained to a dead hare the meaning of some of the paintings hanging in a room (Wie man dem toten Hasen die Bilder erklärt, 1965), Wolf Vostell was installing the first version of Endogene Depression (1975) featuring turkeys, concrete, and television sets in a room at the Sprengel Museum in Hannover, Jannis Kounellis was displaying a parrot on a perch fastened to a steel sheet (Pappagallo, 1967), and Carolee Schneemann was wrapping bodies, the remains of animals, and objects in an orgiastic ritual by enacting the ancestral link between animality and eroticism (Meat Joy, 1964).

Mythological (Matthew Barney), totemic (Jan Fabre), autobiographical (Ana Mendieta), ludic (Jeff Koons), hybrid (Vettor Pisani), sonorous (Bruce Nauman), legendary (James Lee Byars), numerical (Mario Merz), political (Regina José Galindo), sacrificial (Hermann Nitsch), and psychoanalytical (Louise Bourgeois), animals have crossed the multiple glances of art, finding the writings of Donna J. Haraway (When Species Meet, 2007; The Companion Species Manifesto, 2003), L’animal que donc je suis (2006) by Jacques Derrida, and L’Aperto. L’uomo e l’animale by Giorgio Agamben (2002) to be some of the most fertile and radical expressions of contemporary critical thinking.

How is the centuries-old relationship between artist and animal re-read today? How does this relationship define and continue to redefine the hybrid boundaries of art, from Rosmarie Trockel to Mircea Cantor, from Tania Bruguera to John Akomfrah? And how can we query the animal world in the changing of its intentions, expressions, and figurations?

From the theories and movements of the neo-avant-garde in the 1960s and 1970s (from Arte povera to performance art, from Fluxus to public art), via the research of the 1980s and 1990s all the way to the most recent manifestations, this issue of the journal Elephant & Castle. Laboratorio dell'immaginario invites academics, critics, and scholars to put forward unpublished and original contributions, analysing in an interdisciplinary and comparative manner the theme of the animal in contemporary art: a sounding board for our historical actuality.

Curated by Elio Grazioli (Università degli Studi di Bergamo) and Maria Elena Minuto (Université de Liège, KU Leuven)