Linked data (LD) has been a focus of much activity in the fields of cultural heritage, humanities and art and architectural history over the past several years, as evidenced by projects including Yale’s Lux search tool, the Pharos photo archive consortium, the conversion to LD of the data in the Census of Antique Works of Art and Architecture Known in the Renaissance and the Getty Provenance Index, and the development of tools like ResearchSpace (built using Metaphacts) and Arches.

Much of the attention and resources focused on LD has centered on the technical challenges of creating LD repositories and/or interfaces. There have so far been fewer opportunities to consider LD from the researcher’s perspective or for scholars to share with each other the challenges and opportunities of research in an environment of LD. Moreover, as the amount and availability of LD representing cultural heritage and art history grows, the fundamental question of what an LD-enabled research practice would entail remains open and even ambiguous. That is, how specifically do (or could) scholars use linked data or linked data-powered research and discovery tools to conduct research and write histories of art, architecture, and other forms of cultural heritage? What role could scholars of art and architectural history play in creating and maintaining an ecosystem of LD? Moreover, how can LD–in both the practices associated with it and the research it produces–be more ethical and inclusive?